Visit Sharon Waxman's Blog

Tina Brown:

“Sharon Waxman has written a compelling page turner about the world of antiquities and art-world skulduggery. She manages to combine rigorous, scholarly reporting with a flair for intrigue and personality that gives Loot the fast pace of a novel. I enjoyed it immensely."

Christopher Hitchens:

“Sharon Waxman’s Loot is the most instructive as well as the most intelligent (and the most entertaining) guide through the labyrinth of antiquity and the ways in which the claims of the departed intersect with the rights of the living.”

Douglas Preston, author of The Monster of Florence:

"Loot is a riveting foray into the biggest question facing museums today: who should own the great works of ancient art? Sharon Waxman is a first-rate reporter, a veritable Euphronios of words, who not only explores the legal and moral ambiguities of the conflict but brings to life the colorful -- even outrageous -- personalities facing off for a high noon showdown over some of the world’s iconic works of art. Vivid, witty, and delightful, this book will beguile any reader with an interest in art and museums."

Lucette Lagnado, author of The Man in the White Sharkskin Suit:

“Sharon Waxman approaches her subject with the passion of a great journalist and the rigor of a scholar. It may never again be possible for some of us to walk down the halls of the Louvre or the British Museum or the Metropolitan without a vague sense of disquietude, a frisson of wonder about the provenance of some of their showcase works of ancient art.”

Karl E. Meyer, author of The Plundered Past and co-author of Kingmakers: The Invention of the Modern Middle East:

"Sharon Waxman’s Loot is indispensable for everyone concerned with the illicit trade in smuggled antiquities. She exposes the self-serving humbug that too often afflicts both affluent possessors and righteous nationalists and shows that we all have a stake in getting an honest account of how great objects came to rest in our grandest museums."

April 11, 2009

Vernon Silver Takes on Giacomo Medici

I've just finished reading an early galley of Vernon Silver's new book weighing in on the story of stolen Euphronioses and the man most associated with their looting in recent decades, Giacomo Medici.

The book, "The Lost Chalice," comes out in June, and the title refers to a chalice by the famed Greek painter that emerged on the market at around the same time as the more famous, and more valuable, krater bought by the Metropolitan Museum of Art.


Lost chalice The book takes us through a now-familiar cast of characters in this drama - Medici himself, dealer Robert Hecht,  Italian prosecutors, museum curators, tombaroli and that curiously,  still-unmet Swiss restorer, Fritz Burki. (Why have none of us sought this guy out? He must know an awful lot).

 Setting up his tale as a mystery to be solved  Silver takes a micro approach to a great big problem, that of looted antiquities in modern times. We learn that there’s another rare Euphronios out there to be traced and tracked.

I learned a number of things about Medici that I didn’t know, particularly the story of his tragic maiming as a child by a wayward American bomb in World War Two. But I do wonder how much more readers will want to know about this man, who has already been the title subject of another book, Peter Watson’s, “The Medici Conspiracy,” as well as  treated extensively in “Loot.”

 

Medici is not exactly a household name to average readers, and at the same time, the tale doesn’t really feel new. But Silver does a good job of weaving together police evidence, court testimony and interviews with Medici himself. For my money, the most interesting part of the book is not so much the mystery he builds around the elusive Euphronios – after all, it’s just a cup, and it wasn’t held by Jesus, blessed by Caesar or otherwise made a meaningful part of our cultural iconography.

Instead, it’s when Silver finds himself in the humble home of a tombaroli-farmer, invited for lunch at their table. There he hears a detailed account of how they found an ancient Etruscan tomb in Cerveteri, dug it up in an operation that took months and where they found the Euphronios krater and, it appears, the missing chalice. That kind of moment is worth the wait, and a welcome glimpse into the modern, secret journey of such ancient objects.

February 19, 2009

Kazim Finally Convicted for Stealing the Lydian Brooch

I received this email today from my Turkish friend about the sentencing of Kazim Akbiyikoglu, the director of the Usak museum who had been on trial for more than two years over the Lydian hoard:

From Feb. 14:

"The former director of the Usak Museum was sentenced on Friday to serve 12 years and 11 months in prison for dereliction of duty and misappropriation of an atique brooch that went missing in 2006.
One accomplice received 12 years and 6 months in prison while 8 others were sentenced to jail terms between 10 months and most 6 years. The police learned that the brooch, part of a 2500-years-old collection called the Karun Treasure, was replaced by a fake and that the director was in contact with the alleged thieves."

February 09, 2009

Artifacts returned to Pakistan

Britain returns smuggled pottery to Pakistan

LONDON, Feb 9 (Reuters) - Britain on Monday handed back to Pakistan almost 200 smuggled pottery artefacts that were seized by British border officers two years ago.

The 198 bowls and vases were smuggled from Pakistan via Dubai and discovered by the UK Border Agency at London's Heathrow airport in 2007.

The 4,000-year-old relics, which originate from Pakistan's north western frontier, were examined by the British Museum and estimated to have a value of 100,000 pounds ($148,800).

"It's a sort of vandalism, people who steal invaluable things from developing countries at a very cheap price," Wajid Shamsul Hasan, Pakistan's High Commissioner to Britain, said at a ceremony in London.

"This is our nation's heritage which will go back, and people will be happy to see them in the museums," he added.

Smuggled antiques and historic relics often end up in the hands of private collectors willing to pay big sums of money.

"Where ancient sites are plundered for short-term gain, this results both in the loss of heritage items to indigenous people and irreparable damage to archaeological sites," said Tony Walker, director of the UK Border Agency.

Anil Rajput, the customs officer who seized the artefacts in 2007, said they were smuggled from Dubai in freight declared as 'normal pottery' for a value of only $100.

"When I opened the boxes and actually looked at the pots, it was clear that they were not mass-produced in a factory in Dubai," he said. (Reporting by Martina Fuchs, editing by Mark Trevelyan)

San Diego Appearance

MARCH 7, 2009
4pm-6pm

Universtiy of San Diego (USD)
Degheri Alumni Center
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110
March 7, 2009, 4:00-6:00 p.m.
Hosted by Alex and Suzette Valle
Special Introduction by Robert L. Pincus Ph.D, San Diego Union Tribune Art Critic/Books Editor

February 06, 2009

A fantastic review for Loot



Sydney Morning Herald (Australia)

February 7, 2009 Saturday 
First Edition

In short nonfiction

BYLINE: Reviews by Bruce Elder

SECTION: SPECTRUM; Books; Pg. 31

LOOT

By Sharon Waxman

Times Books

What do you feel about all those antiquities from Greece, Egypt, Italy and the Middle East that are now on display in museums all over the world? Should they be returned to their countries of origin or do you agree with Aggy Leroule, the Louvre's press attache who claims: "You end up thinking we're all a bunch of looters, thieves, exploiters, that we're some kind of criminals . . . but who would be interested in Greek sculpture if it were all in Greece? These pieces are great because they're in the Louvre."

This is a fabulously well-written book full of outrage and shady intrigue. When you blend a fine journalistic style with a postgraduate degree in Middle East studies, you have a person who can write entertainingly about one of the modern world's most divisive artistic problems.

Waxman brings many of the key figures alive, debates the issues with subtlety and nuance and exposes much of the cultural arrogance that still underpins the belief that Western museums have some right to hold antiquities.

A reader's response

Who does History belong to?  That is the question.
 
It belongs to the world. To assume that it belongs to the source country
is a fallacy.  Egypt of today has no respect for antiquity or the ancient
Egyptians. Or will they ever learn that respect.
 
Looting and greed exists and has existed for thousands of years and Egyptians
have done more damage than anyone else (Nasser's dam in the 1950's).
 
We should thank the people who saved these artifacts for all of us to see and
admire. Surely, some made much money, but think what they gave us.  
Think of their scholarship (translating hieroglyphics, for one) that contributed 
to our knowledge.
 
We should thank the museums for their work in preservation and displays as
most of us would never have seen any of these treasures without them.
 
Marcia Winick
Tucson, Arizona
world


February 01, 2009

Artifacts vs. Facsimiles: a solution?

-An interesting suggestion from a reader:

My thanks to you and all who contributed to the Times (C-Span) program.  As soon as it ended I logged onto Amazon and ordered both "Loot" and "Who Owns..."   I'm eager to hold and read your book.

But I suspect that neither book will address what I'm about to ask you to comment on, viz---

Technology developed just in the past 10 years or so has made it not only possible, but rather easy, to create "three-dimensional scans" of precious, fragile,objects, without even touching them in the process of scanning them. And then from the scan, one (or 100)facsimiles may be made (and/or holograms, of course). There would be no risk of a copy becoming the object of fraud, as the material itself would be (e.g.) some modern plastic.  As best I recall, the Rosetta Stone is behind glass, and the viewer would be reasonably satisfied (or would she??) if what she was seeing was (and was labelled as) a facsimile.  As for Nefertiti, and the like, surface color etc. would still be a problem.

This technology is quite different from long-known methods such as lost-wax, or rubber mold, etc., from which museum shops have long sold "copies" of objects----Those copies are (because of the older technology) always at least slightly off in terms of size (and quality, of course).

What I'm suggesting would be particularly useful for such situations as the Elgin marbles (which Hitchens wants returned to Athens in order that the entablature be "complete")----Athens could have "the whole thing" (of which half would be a copy), and Bloomsbury would also have "the whole thing" (of which the OTHER half would be a copy).

What I'm suggesting DOES, obviously, fail to meet what I call the "piece of the true cross" test---some sort of transendental "union" with the past that for some (but not all) people is crucial to the experience of being in the presence of an important object. But for so many objects (e.g."your" Zodiacal ceiling; the Parthenon pieces), it seems to me this would be (thanks to this quite-new technology) a solution that could be at least tolerable to all interested parties.

I'm not so grandiose as to think that no one until me, now, has thought of this----So my question is: Can you point me to one or two sources where this has been seriously discussed in either scholarly or political venues?

Many thanks
              Alan W. Heldman (B'ham AL)

January 23, 2009

Egypt Demands Artifacts Return from Sweden

From BBC News:

Luxor

Egypt has asked Sweden for the return of 212 artefacts taken out of the country in the 1920s.

Egypt's chief archaeologist Zahi Hawass said they were taken in an "illegal manner" by Swedish collector Otto Smith from locations like Saqqara and Luxor.

He said lawyers for the country's Council of Antiquities have contacted Sweden's Ostergotlands County Museum.

The museum confirmed Egypt was seeking to recover about 200 items, but was awaiting a formal request.

Museum director Maria Jansen said she had been contacted by the Egyptian Embassy in Stockholm about the matter, but could not comment further.

She said the items were one of the museum's most "important" collections.

Neglect

Mr Smith took the objects home to Sweden with him, and after his death his family gave the pieces to the Ostergotlands Museum, asking the museum to look after them, according to Mr Hawass.

Mr Hawass claimed the museum displayed some of the artefacts in its restaurant, which caused damage and neglect.

He added that the Smith family has now accused the museum of breach of contract and also wanted the pieces returned to Egypt.

The family could not immediately be reached for comment.

Mr Hawass said the objects include items from the pharaonic era and ancient Egyptian Coptic pieces.


January 20, 2009

The Getty: "Settling down, not shaking up."

Judith H. Dobrzynski of The Wall Street Journal writes about The Getty "easing into young adulthood," and new director James N. Wood creating a sum of all the foundation's parts, rather than allowing competition between the branches:

"What Mr. Wood is trying to change is the Getty's milieu. He wants the four branches to collaborate and cooperate much more. "Wherever possible, we want a program in one to overlap with at least one of the others," he says. "One through four should add up to six." The Getty should be a piazza, where people share ideas, not an acropolis with temples dedicated to different cults, different gods. Under Mr. Munitz, for example, the branch heads rarely, if ever, formally sat down and compared notes; each branch was a silo. Mr. Wood now holds Monday morning staff meetings with them, plus other top officials. Employing a metaphor for what he does, Mr. Wood says, "I create the centripetal force, as opposed to the centrifugal force."

Dobryznski's article also mentions "Loot":
"Like other museums, the Getty has been forced to return many ancient artifacts to Italy and Greece and, worse, it had to watch its former antiquities curator Marion True stand trial on charges of trafficking in looted objects. It suffered the scandal of Barry Munitz, Mr. Williams's successor, whose profligate spending, fighting with staff and questionable practices led to his forced resignation. In "Loot," a book published in November, journalist Sharon Waxman devoted a chapter to describing the trust's pernicious culture, including tales of rampant sexual misconduct among staffers."

Check out the rest of the article here

January 16, 2009

"Loot" Reviewed in The Nation Article

Check out this article by Britt Peterson from the current issue of The Nation, which reviews "Loot" at length.

A counterfeit hippocampus on display in Usak, Turkey Sharon Waxman

Site Archives